โš ๏ธ

PPWR is directly applicable from August 12, 2026. No national transposition required. The Declaration of Conformity obligation, PFAS limits, and EPR registration and fee obligations apply on that date across all 27 EU member states. Grade-based eco-modulation of EPR fees is mandatory under Art. 6(4)(d)/6(8) but binds later, around mid-2031 (18 months after both the Art. 6(4) delegated acts, due Jan 1, 2028, and the Art. 6(5) implementing acts, due Jan 1, 2030). 9 cost-driving items remain pending out of roughly 30 expected in total. Only Art. 6(4) and Art. 11(2) are delegated acts; Art. 64 carries the exhaustive list of delegated empowerments and everything else here is an implementing act or a standardization request; key technical thresholds are still being finalized.

27
EU Member States
Aug 12
2026 Enforcement Date
9
Cost-Driving Acts Pending
Art. 6(8)
Eco-Modulation Mandatory

๐Ÿ“ฐ Latest developments

All updates โ†’
Aug 12, 2026

The PPWR applies from today in all 27 member states. PFAS limits on food-contact packaging, the Declaration of Conformity and the authorized-representative deadline for non-EU producers all start now. Recyclability grades, recycled content, empty space and reuse targets do not; those sit at 2030 or later and each is a floor that moves if its act is late.

Aug 12, 2026

Twelve annulment actions against the PPWR are pending at the EU General Court. Seven target the whole Regulation. The rest cluster on the deposit-return rules, the reuse targets, the restricted formats and recycled content. Nothing is suspended and every date still stands, but that is where the legal risk sits.

Aug 12, 2026

The labeling implementing act missed its deadline today. No Art. 12 act appears on the EUR-Lex record. Because the obligation applies 24 months after the act or on August 12, 2028, whichever is later, 2028 is now a floor rather than a date. Do not finalize sorting-label artwork yet.

Aug 4, 2026

Thirteen member states still have not named a PPWR enforcement authority. Article 40(3) requires every member state to tell the Commission which authorities enforce the Regulation. Fourteen have. Italy, Spain, Poland, Portugal, Greece and eight others have not, eight days before the rules apply. Your obligations start August 12 everywhere regardless, so treat this as uneven timing, not a reprieve.

Aug 4, 2026

A sixth corrigendum, in German, and the English text still has not moved. Article 29(4)(b) now reads "Waren" (goods) instead of "Rohstoffe" (raw materials), so the reuse exemption for custom-designed transport packaging is wider in German than it appeared. The English has always read "commodities" and is unchanged. If your team quotes a non-English text, re-check it against the current version.

Read this week's update or browse the full dated archive, one page per development with its source.

What is the PPWR?

A plain-language primer on Regulation (EU) 2025/40
Regulation (EU) 2025/40 on Packaging and Packaging Waste (PPWR) entered into force on February 11, 2025. It is directly applicable EU law, no national transposition law is needed. The Commission's official interpretive guidance was published in the Official Journal on June 10, 2026 as Commission Notice C/2026/3084. DG Environment separately maintains a Frequently Asked Questions document, whose second edition was published on July 31, 2026 (ISBN 978-92-68-42316-5). It complements the Commission Notice and is interpretive: it shows what the Commission says, not what the Regulation requires. Every business that places packaged goods on the EU market, including importers and online marketplaces, must comply from August 12, 2026. The regulation covers all packaging: primary (consumer-facing), secondary (transit), and tertiary (industrial/transport).

๐ŸŽฏ Core Goals

  • Reduce packaging weight and complexity (minimization rules)
  • Make all packaging recyclable or reusable by 2030
  • Mandate post-consumer recycled (PCR) content targets by 2030
  • Harmonize EPR fees across all 27 member states via eco-modulation
  • Mandate DRS for beverage containers by 2029
  • Eliminate PFAS from food-contact packaging (from Aug 12, 2026)

๐Ÿ“‹ Who Must Comply

Art. 3(1)(15) defines producer as five independent tests, not a ranking. Any manufacturer, importer or distributor meeting one of them is the producer, so the same product can have a different producer in each member state.

  • Limbs (a) and (b): established in a member state and supplying it for the first time from within that same state
  • Limbs (c) and (d): established in a member state or a third country and supplying another member state directly to end users. A business customer that consumes what it buys is an end user (Art. 3(1)(23)), so direct cross-border B2B is caught
  • Limb (e): unpacking packaged products without being an end user, unless another person is the producer under (a) to (d)
What moves the obligation, and the other roles
  • Selling through a distributor established in the destination market can make that distributor the producer there, under limb (a) or (b)
  • Limb (c) and (d) producers must appoint an authorized representative by written mandate in every member state they supply other than their state of establishment (Art. 45(3)). This is the duty non-EU sellers most often miss
  • Packaging suppliers and converters owe the manufacturer the information and Annex VII technical documentation needed to demonstrate conformity (Art. 16), independently of the producer analysis
  • Distributors must verify, before making packaging available, that the producer is registered under Art. 44, that the packaging is labeled under Art. 12, and that manufacturer and importer duties are met (Art. 19)
  • Online marketplaces are not producers under PPWR. A platform letting consumers conclude distance contracts must obtain the producer's Art. 44 registration number and self-certification and assess them before allowing use of its service (Art. 45(4) and (6)), and may meet the producer's Art. 45(2) cost obligations only on a written mandate

Art. 45(1) attaches EPR to packaging a producer makes available for the first time on the territory of a member state, or unpacks without being an end user.

Which limb applies to your company is a question about your route to market in each member state. Source: Regulation (EU) 2025/40, Arts. 3(1)(15), 3(1)(23), 16, 19, 44 and 45, read in the OJ PDF on August 8, 2026 [LOCKED].

๐Ÿงญ Where to Start

The changes are coming in waves

Milestone that reshapes the market Phased obligation or Commission deadline
12 Aug 2026Now
General applicationEnforcement
PFAS banned in food-contact packaging; EU Declaration of Conformity required; producer identification and marking; EPR registration in every market; suppliers must provide accurate material data (Art. 16). No grace period for packaging placed after this date.
12 Feb 20272027
Refill in hospitality
HORECA must let consumers bring their own container and must offer a refill option.
1 Jan 20282028
Recyclability rules get defined
Deadline for the Commission to set the design-for-recyclability grades (A, B, C). The criteria you must design against become concrete. This is the critical path for the 2030 wall.
12 Feb 20282028
Compostability mandates
EU-wide (Art. 9(1)): permeable tea, coffee and beverage bags, soft single-serve units, and sticky labels on fruit and vegetables must be industrially compostable. Rigid non-metal machine capsules and lightweight plastic carrier bags are a member state option only (Art. 9(2)(a)), not an EU mandate.
12 Aug 20282028
Labeling reset
A harmonized EU sorting label replaces national marks and QR or other standardized open digital-marking requirements begin (Art. 12). Expect a pan-EU artwork change. PPWR creates no Digital Product Passport; that is an ESPR instrument.
1 Jan 20292029
Deposit return systems live
Every member state must operate a deposit return system for single-use plastic beverage bottles and metal beverage containers up to three litres, and hit 90% separate collection (Art. 50).
12 Feb 20292029
Reusability label and reuse QR
Reusable packaging placed on the market from February 12, 2029, or 30 months after the Art. 12(6) implementing act enters into force, whichever is the latest, must bear a reusability label plus a QR code or other standardized open digital data carrier giving further reuse information (Art. 12(2)). Open loop systems with no system operator are exempt (Art. 12(3)).
~ mid 20312031
Fees start to follow grade
Eco-modulated EPR fees keyed to recyclability grade begin to bite (about 18 months after the design-for-recyclability act). A low-grade format now costs more every year.
1 Jan 20302030
The design wallRedesign by here
Grades A, B, or C become mandatory (below C is off the EU market); minimum recycled content in plastic; a 50% empty-space cap; single-use format bans; and reuse targets all take effect together.
1 Jan 20352035
Recyclable at scale
The tougher "recyclable at scale" test is added to the 2030 design-for-recycling test, not a substitute for it. From 2035 packaging must satisfy both, and the grade floor still tightens to A or B in 2038.
1 Jan 20382038
Top grades only
Only grades A and B may be placed on the market; grade C is phased out.
1 Jan 20402040
Higher targets
Recycled-content minimums and reuse targets step up again.

Key terms, including Producer, Declaration of Conformity, eco-modulation, recyclability grades, PCR content, and PFAS, are defined on the Glossary tab.

โ„น๏ธ About This Hub

This hub is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, regulatory, or compliance advice. The EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation is still being operationalized: deadlines, thresholds, fee rates, and exemptions change as the delegated and implementing acts are finalized. Verify all information against the primary sources, including Regulation (EU) 2025/40 on EUR-Lex, the European Commission's official PPWR guidance, the DG Environment PPWR FAQ, second edition of July 31, 2026, the delegated and implementing acts as they are adopted, and the national EPR scheme (PRO) in each market where you sell, or with qualified legal counsel before taking compliance action.

PPWR Atlas is built and maintained by Dave Hartter, a packaging and product sustainability advisor with more than 20 years at global manufacturers, most recently as Director of Sustainability at Huber Engineered Materials and Newell Brands. He combines technical rigor with commercial logic, connecting regulation and customer requirements to real product and packaging decisions.

He now advises CPG brands and packaging suppliers on EU packaging compliance under the PPWR: where the fees land, how design and material choices change them, and how to turn early compliance into risk mitigation and a product advantage that future-proofs the portfolio. PPWR Atlas is the public version of that work, updated weekly from primary sources.

For advisory engagements or corrections, reach Dave at info@hartteradvisory.com. More about the author and advisory services →

Prepare for PPWR

PPWR at a glance

If your company puts packaging or packaged products on the EU market, PPWR applies wherever the company is based. The regulation is already in force and phases in through 2040, and the most expensive decisions are the design choices being made now, because product cycles run 18 to 36 months and the formats you sell in 2030 are being chosen today.

Deadline
The first hard date is 12 August 2026, when PFAS is banned in food-contact packaging and a Declaration of Conformity, producer marking, and EPR registration become mandatory in every market you sell into, with no grace period for new packaging.
The wall
The design wall arrives on 1 January 2030, when recyclability grades, recycled-content minimums, a 50% empty-space cap, and reuse targets all take effect together. Grade C and the empty-space cap each carry a "whichever is later" clause tied to their delegated acts, so 2030 is the earliest date, not a guaranteed one.
Cost
From about mid-2031, EPR fees begin to follow recyclability grade, so a low-grade format carries a cost your company pays every year rather than once.
Scope
Non-EU sellers are included and usually need an EU representative, and the design, substance, and labeling rules apply regardless of volume.
Before August 12

Three important points about August 12 that are easy to miss

These three points sit in the detail of the regulation and the Commission guidance rather than in the headline dates, and each one changes what you actually have to do. Sources are cited so you can check them.

1. The recyclability obligation starts on August 12, 2026. The grades start in 2030.

These are two different things and they have two different dates. The Commission guidance is explicit: "Article 6(1) requires that all packaging placed on the market is recyclable without providing a specific deadline for the application of this provision, which means that it applies from 12 August 2026." Until the Article 6(4) design-for-recycling act applies, you comply against the old Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive requirements and the related harmonized standard, EN 13430:2004, and your Declaration of Conformity attests to that. You do not run the Article 38 conformity assessment for recyclability until the Article 6(4) act is in force. [LOCKED, Commission Notice C/2026/3084, June 10, 2026]

2. Packaging already placed on the market does not have to be withdrawn

There is no transitional period for exhausting stocks. The guidance also says, though, that packaging "placed on the market before 12 August 2026 may remain on the market and does not need to be withdrawn." What matters is when placing on the market happens, and that is the transfer of ownership or possession, not the sale to a consumer. For imported packaging or packaged products, the relevant timestamp is release for free circulation at the end of the customs procedure. Stock that clears customs on August 11 is placed on the market. Note also that sales and grouped food-contact packaging are placed on the market when they are filled, while transport and service packaging are placed on the market empty. [LOCKED, Commission Notice C/2026/3084, section on PFAS enforcement and exhaustion of stocks]

3. Directive 94/62/EC is only partly repealed on August 12

Article 70 repeals Directive 94/62/EC with effect from August 12, 2026, but keeps several provisions running. Article 8(2) on marking continues until 30 months after the Article 12(6) implementing act enters into force. Article 9(1) and (2) continue for the first-indent essential requirements until December 31, 2029. Articles 5(2) and (3), 6(1)(d) and (e), and 6a continue until December 31, 2028, and Article 12(3a) to (4) until December 31, 2028, or 2029 for data transmission to the Commission. Decision 97/129/EC on the material identification system is not repealed until August 12, 2028. [LOCKED, Reg (EU) 2025/40 Art. 70]

Four moves, in order
  1. Map the whole portfolio first, every SKU and component, including secondary, transport, e-commerce, and imported packaging, because everything downstream keys off a complete map.
  2. Stand up the compliance file, meaning the Declaration of Conformity, producer marking, EPR registration, and removal of PFAS from food-contact formats, all due by 12 August 2026.
  3. Design to Grade A or B rather than the 2030 floor, since Grade C is legal in 2030 but banned in 2038, and designing once to the tougher bar avoids a second redesign.
  4. Name one owner and brief leadership early, because PPWR is cross-functional and stalls without a clear owner and an executive mandate.
Requirements attach to packaging formats, not individual SKUs. PPWR obligations (the Declaration of Conformity, the recyclability grade, and the recycled-content and design rules) apply per packaging type: a stable combination of format, structure, and materials. Every SKU that shares the same packaging is covered by one assessment and one Declaration of Conformity. You map SKUs to find your distinct formats, then comply format by format.
Expand any area below for the detail. The full milestone timeline, every date from 2026 to 2040, lives on the Overview tab.
Does PPWR apply to your company, and in what role?
Two separate questions. Whether PPWR reaches your packaging, and whether you are the producer for it. The design, substance and labeling rules bind packaging placed on the EU market wherever your company is based. Who carries the producer duties is a different question, answered by the five independent limbs of Art. 3(1)(15), which turn on where you are established, which territory you supply from, and whether you sell directly to end users, so it can differ per member state. Only limb (c) and (d) producers must appoint an authorized representative (Art. 45(3)); a non-EU seller supplying through an importer or a distributor established in the destination market may not be the producer there at all. National EPR schemes may set small-quantity reporting thresholds, but the design, substance, and labeling rules apply to your packaging regardless of size.

Brand owner or filler

Producer, if a limb applies

You sell products in EU packaging under your brand, whether you fill it yourself or a co-packer does it for you. Which Art. 3(1)(15) limb catches you depends on where you are established and which territory you first supply.

Importer or online seller

Producer, if a limb applies

You bring packaged goods into the EU, or sell into the EU from outside it. Importing does not by itself make you the producer: limb (a) or (b) catches you where you are established in the member state you first supply, limbs (c) and (d) where you supply another member state directly to end users. Art. 18 sets your importer duties either way.

Retailer or distributor

Verify + own label

You sell or move other brands' packaged goods within the EU. Art. 19 requires you to verify producer registration and Art. 12 labeling first. Private label normally makes you the manufacturer under Art. 3(1)(13)(a), which is a separate definition. One carve-out: under Art. 3(1)(13)(b) the manufacturer is your supplier instead, but only where the brand owner is a micro-enterprise under Recommendation 2003/361/EC AND that supplier is located in the same member state. Both conditions must hold together, so a micro-enterprise brand buying from another member state is still the manufacturer itself. Whether you are also the producer still follows the Art. 3(1)(15) limbs.

Packaging maker or supplier

Data duty

You make or supply empty packaging or components that end up on goods sold in the EU.

Marketplace or fulfillment

Facilitation duty

You list, store, or dispatch other sellers' packaged goods bound for EU buyers.

Your company is likely in scope if any of these is true: you sell packaged products in the EU; you import packaging or packaged goods into the EU; you ship to EU consumers online; or you make or supply packaging used on goods sold in the EU.
See your duty list, by role and packaging type
Pick your role and the packaging types you use to see which PPWR obligations apply to you, and when. Every date is taken from the EUR-Lex text of Regulation (EU) 2025/40 (fact base locked July 2, 2026); evidence labels show how settled each item is.
Your role
Packaging types (pick all that apply)
Role-wide duties (like EPR registration) always show; type-specific rows appear only for the types you pick.
โš ๏ธ Planning aid only, not legal advice. Dates marked LOCKED were read in the EUR-Lex text of Regulation (EU) 2025/40; SIGNALED items rest on official sources not yet final or not yet re-read; SPECULATIVE items are proposals. Several 2030+ dates shift if their delegated or implementing acts are adopted late (the row notes say so). Verify against primary sources before compliance decisions.
Where to put your effort, phase by phase
Now

Get the day-one basics locked

Before 12 Aug 2026
Map the whole portfolio first, including secondary, transport, e-commerce, and imported packaging.
Everything downstream (fees, the Declaration of Conformity, redesign priorities) keys off a complete SKU and component map. Gaps here show up late as compliance holes.
Stand up the compliance file: Declaration of Conformity, producer marking, and EPR registration in every market you sell into.
These are legal obligations on 12 August 2026 with no grace period for new packaging. Registration in each member state takes lead time.
Get PFAS out of food-contact formats and document it with third-party certificates.
The PFAS limit is one of the few hard bans that bites on day one. Supplier assurances are not enough; you need test certificates for your file.
Start collecting supplier data in a structured format (Article 16).
You cannot complete a Declaration of Conformity without accurate composition, recycled-content, and substance data from suppliers. Build the data spine now.
Next

Set up for the 2028 acts

2026 to 2028
Pre-assess recyclability against proxies (RecyClass, APR, JRC) before the 2028 grades are final.
Waiting for final criteria wastes the two-year runway to 2030. Product cycles run 18 to 36 months, so the formats sold in 2030 are being chosen now.
Get ready for the labeling change.
The 2028 harmonized label and the Art. 12 QR or digital data carrier mean a pan-EU artwork update, and the Art. 12(9) digital-only rule for EPR-scheme marks lands earlier, on February 12, 2027. Pre-build templates and data fields so it becomes a switch, not a scramble.
Attack minimization and empty space early.
The 50% empty-space cap and minimization rules land in 2030, but the redesigns and tooling changes take time. Overpackaging is the easiest early win.
Forward

Design for 2030 and the grades beyond

2028 onward
Design to Grade A or B, not the 2030 floor.
Grade C is legal in 2030 but banned in 2038. Designing once to the tougher bar avoids a second redesign a few years later.
Build certified recycled content into sourcing.
The 2030 recycled-content targets need certified chain-of-custody, and certified PCR capacity is constrained. Qualify supply ahead of demand.
Treat the EPR fee as total cost of ownership.
From about 2029 fees follow grade, so a low-grade format carries a recurring annual cost. Model that fee into format decisions, not just unit price.
Add reuse and refill where the format fits.
The 2030 reuse targets and refill obligations pull demand toward reusable formats, and a refill line also lowers the volume you place on the market.
Mobilize your team and brief leadership

Get your organization moving

  • Name one owner and pull in design, procurement, logistics, legal, and sustainability. PPWR is cross-functional and it stalls without a clear owner.
  • Find your at-risk SKUs and size the cost. Run the portfolio map, then use the Format Risk Screener to flag formats likely to miss the grade and the Fee Estimator to put a number on your EU exposure.
  • Turn it into a 90-day plan. PFAS and documentation first, then the redesign candidates the screener surfaces, sequenced against the phases above.

Brief your executives

  • The deadline is real and phased. It starts 12 August 2026 and tightens through 2030, 2038, and 2040.
  • The costly decisions are being made now, not in 2030. Product cycles run 18 to 36 months, so today's format choices lock in 2030 compliance and years of EPR fees.
  • It touches the whole business and the budget. Design, procurement, legal, and sustainability all have a part, and low-grade formats carry a fee we pay every year.
The 30-second version: PPWR is an EU packaging law that affects our market access and margins from 2026. If we act now on our top SKUs, we avoid a redesign scramble and lower our ongoing fees.
Frequently asked questions

The questions companies ask first when PPWR lands on their desk. Click any question to open the answer. Planning context, not legal advice.

Do I need a Declaration of Conformity for every SKU?

No. PPWR requirements attach to packaging formats, not individual SKUs. The Declaration of Conformity is drawn up per packaging type, a stable combination of format, component structure, material composition, and compliance-relevant features, so every SKU that uses the identical packaging shares one declaration. A change of material, supplier, weight, or format triggers a new version.

What does PPWR require on August 12, 2026, versus later?

From August 12, 2026 the substantive obligations are the Declaration of Conformity, EPR registration and fees in every market, and the PFAS limits for food-contact packaging. Minimization binds from day one too, but under the Directive 94/62/EC essential requirements that Article 70(1)(b) keeps in force until December 31, 2029, not yet under PPWR Article 10. The recyclability grade, recycled-content minimums, the Article 10 minimization duty, the 50 percent empty-space cap, and reuse targets apply from January 1, 2030, and harmonized labeling from August 12, 2028, or 24 months after the Art. 12(6) or 12(7) implementing acts enter into force, whichever is the latest. So the Declaration of Conformity is required day one, but mainly attests identity, substances, and minimization, with the design attestations added as their delegated acts arrive.

Where do I submit the Declaration of Conformity?

Nowhere. There is no EU portal or central authority for it. You hold it on file and produce it to a national market surveillance authority on request. That is different from EPR registration, which does go into national registers such as Germany's LUCID. The declaration follows the Annex VIII structure and travels through the supply chain with the packaging.

Who must comply: the brand owner, the importer, or the supplier?

Whichever of them meets one of the five independent tests in Art. 3(1)(15), which is not a ranking. Limbs (a) and (b) catch a manufacturer, importer or distributor established in a member state that supplies for the first time from within that state on that same territory. Limbs (c) and (d) catch one established in a member state or a third country supplying another member state directly to end users, and a business customer that consumes what it buys is an end user under Art. 3(1)(23), so direct cross-border B2B is caught. Limb (e) catches unpacking without being an end user unless someone else is the producer under (a) to (d). There is no cascade and no test that turns on whether an EU manufacturer exists, so the producer can differ per member state and per route to market: selling through a distributor established in the destination market can make that distributor the producer there. Limb (c) and (d) producers must appoint an authorized representative by written mandate in each member state they supply other than their state of establishment (Art. 45(3)). Packaging suppliers and converters owe the manufacturer conformity information and Annex VII documentation (Art. 16), and distributors must verify producer registration, Art. 12 labeling and upstream duties (Art. 19). Online marketplaces are not producers under PPWR. Which limb applies to your company is a question about your route to market in each member state. Source: Regulation (EU) 2025/40, Arts. 3(1)(15), 3(1)(23), 16, 19, 44 and 45, read in the OJ PDF on August 8, 2026 [LOCKED].

Do non-EU sellers have to comply, and do I need an EU representative?

Yes, but how it applies depends on the route to market. PPWR reaches any company that makes packaging or packaged products available on the EU market for the first time, wherever it is based. Selling directly to end users in a member state makes the seller the producer there under Art. 3(1)(15)(c) or (d), and Art. 45(3) then requires an authorized representative appointed by written mandate in each such member state. Selling instead through an importer or a distributor established in the destination market can put the producer obligation on that party under limb (a) or (b). Online marketplaces are not producers under PPWR; under Art. 45(4) and (6) a platform must obtain and assess the producer registration number and self-certification before allowing use of its service. EPR registration remains country-by-country, and some member states add their own requirements: Austria requires an authorized representative for cross-border distance sellers with no de minimis volume.

What are recyclability grades A, B, and C?

PPWR Annex II grades packaging recyclability by weight: Grade A is 95 percent or more recyclable, Grade B is 80 percent or more, and Grade C is 70 percent or more. Below 70 percent is non-recyclable and cannot be placed on the EU market from January 1, 2030. From January 1, 2038 only Grade A or B is allowed. Exact per-material criteria are pending the design-for-recycling delegated act (ACT-02, due January 1, 2028).

What is the empty-space limit for e-commerce and transport packaging?

From January 1, 2030, grouped, transport, and e-commerce packaging may not exceed a 50 percent empty-space ratio under Article 24. The figure is 50 percent, not the 40 percent that circulated in earlier drafts, and the calculation-method act is due February 12, 2028. Two related duties sit elsewhere: Article 24(4) requires empty space in sales packaging to be reduced to the functional minimum from February 12, 2028, and the general packaging minimization duty in Article 10 applies from January 1, 2030.

What is the PFAS threshold for food-contact packaging?

PFAS are banned from food-contact packaging from August 12, 2026 at three limits under Art. 5(5): 25 ppb for an individual PFAS, 250 ppb for the sum of PFAS, both excluding polymeric PFAS, and 50 ppm for total PFAS including polymeric. The Commission's June 2026 guidance recommends a stepwise test: total fluorine first, and under 50 mg/kg the sample can be treated as compliant. Test grease-resistant paper and board formats now, since reformulation lead times run 12 to 18 months.

When does eco-modulation of EPR fees become mandatory?

Grade-based eco-modulation of EPR fees is mandatory under Article 6(8), with the framework set by the Article 6(4)(d) delegated act, but binds later. Art. 6(8) sets the clock at 18 months from entry into force of BOTH the Art. 6(4) delegated acts (due January 1, 2028) and the Art. 6(5) implementing acts (due January 1, 2030). On the later of those, modulation binds around mid-2031, not 2029. National PROs already modulate fees by design today, so a low-grade format carries a recurring annual cost.

Need help preparing, or an exec-ready brief?

Get hands-on support to map your portfolio, size your exposure, build the compliance file, and brief your leadership.

Get in touch
Country Navigator
Click any country on the map to see EPR system details, fee thresholds, eco-modulation notes, and DRS status. All 27 member states are subject to PPWR direct application from August 12, 2026.
DRS Active
DRS In Development
DRS Deferred / Limited
DRS Not Yet Operational
๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ
Select a Country
Select any country to see EPR program details, thresholds, and DRS status.

All 27 Member States, EPR & DRS Summary

PPWR Art. 50 DRS mandate: By January 1, 2029 member states must ensure separate collection of at least 90 percent by weight of single-use plastic beverage bottles and single-use metal beverage containers of up to 3 litres, and must set up deposit return systems to achieve it. There is no 0.1L lower bound in scope; member states MAY exempt containers below 0.1L where participation is not technically feasible. A member state may seek exemption from the DRS obligation itself if its separate-collection rate for that format was 80 percent or more by weight in calendar year 2026 and it notified the Commission with an implementation plan by January 1, 2028, so DRS is not automatically universal. Glass is not simply optional: member states SHALL ENDEAVOUR to establish DRS for single-use glass beverage bottles and beverage cartons (Art. 50(8)), and may go beyond the minimum to include other materials. Click any country on the map for its DRS status, launch date, deposit amount, scope, and operator.
Fee data note: Base EPR fee rates are indicative figures from 2025/early 2026 schedules. Eco-modulation adjustments can shift final liability significantly. Verify current tariffs directly with each national PRO.
CountryPRO / RegistrySME ThresholdDRS StatusKey Note
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช GermanyLUCID / Multiple PROsโ‰ค80,000 units AND โ‰ค200 kgDRS Active, โ‚ฌ0.25Competitive multi-PRO market. Declaration of Completeness required above tonnage threshold.
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท FranceCITEO / Lรฉko~โ‰ค200 units or โ‰ค5 kg (~โ‚ฌ80/yr flat)DRS DevelopingTriman label still required. ICP B2B rate from Jan 1, 2026. CITEO bonus/malus up to ยฑ100%.
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น ItalyCONAI (7 consortia)Varies by consortiumDRS DevelopingAlphanumeric codes required. TRIS notification 2026/0167/IT in EC review.
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ SpainEcoembes / Envalora<15 tonnes/yearDRS StalledSDDR statutory deadline Nov 2026 (RD 1055/2022) but operator authorization stalled; PPWR Art. 50 backstop is Jan 1, 2029. No PPWR national implementing measures enacted.
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ NetherlandsVerpact<50 tonnes/yearDRS Active, โ‚ฌ0.15/โ‚ฌ0.25Most generous SME threshold. Statiegeld fully operational. DRS-eligible formats require deposit marking.
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ PolandNFOลšiGW / BDOPLN 150/quarter waiverDRS Not YetAll private PROs liquidated. AR required for non-EU e-commerce sellers. BDO portal in Polish.
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น AustriaARAKleinstzeichner ~โ‚ฌ150/yr flat rateDRS Limited / VoluntaryStrictest AR requirement in EU, zero de minimis. Omnibus AR suspension dropped from the Council negotiating mandate June 24, 2026; stalled, not adopted.
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช BelgiumFost Plus / Bruxelles-PropretรฉVaries by regionDRS DevelopingThree separate regional EPR schemes (Flanders, Wallonia, Brussels).
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช SwedenFTI (Fรถrpacknings- och Tidningsinsamlingen)~2 tonnes/yearDRS Active, SEK 1โ€“2Mature EPR system since 1994. Pantamera DRS operational.
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ DenmarkDansk Retursystem~1 tonne/yearDRS Active, DKK 1โ€“3One of oldest DRS systems globally (1989). High return rates.
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ FinlandRinki / Palpa~1 tonne/yearDRS Active, โ‚ฌ0.10โ€“โ‚ฌ0.40World-leading return rates (>93%). DRS since 1996.
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czech RepublicEKO-KOM300 kg or 600 unitsDRS DevelopingDRS legislation under development. EKO-KOM well-established.
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ HungaryOHรœ~200 kgDRS Active, HUF 50Centralized state system. DRS launched 2024 via MOHU.
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด RomaniaANPM / RetuROTo confirmDRS Active, RON 0.50DRS launched Nov 2023 via RetuRO.
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ BulgariaECOBULPACKTo confirmDRS Not YetEPR system transitioning. PPWR application may outpace national readiness.
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท GreeceEOANTo confirmDRS Not YetEPR system in place. Limited DRS development. PPWR mandate by 2029.
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น PortugalSPV (Sociedade Ponto Verde)~1 tonne/yearDRS Not YetDRS in planning. SPV EPR system well-established.
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช IrelandRepak / Re-Turn~1 tonne or โ‚ฌ1M turnoverDRS Active, โ‚ฌ0.15/โ‚ฌ0.25Re-Turn DRS launched 2024. Repak established EPR operator.
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ SlovakiaNATUR-PACK / ENVI-PAKTo confirmDRS Active, โ‚ฌ0.15DRS operational since 2022.
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท CroatiaFZOEUTo confirmDRS ActiveDRS operational since 2006 via FZOEU.
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ SloveniaSLOPAKTo confirmDRS DevelopingDRS in development. SLOPAK EPR system established.
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช EstoniaEesti PandipakendTo confirmDRS Active, โ‚ฌ0.10DRS operational since 2005.
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป LatviaLatvijas Zaฤผais PunktsTo confirmDRS Active, โ‚ฌ0.10DRS operational since 2011.
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น LithuaniaGreen Dot LithuaniaTo confirmDRS Active, โ‚ฌ0.10DRS operational since 2016.
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ LuxembourgValorlux~300 kgDRS Not YetSmall market. Valorlux EPR established. PPWR DRS mandate by 2029.
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ CyprusGreenDotCyprusTo confirmDRS Not YetEPR system present. PPWR DRS mandate by 2029.
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡น MaltaGreenPak / WasteServTo confirmDRS Not YetVery small market. GreenPak EPR operational. PPWR DRS mandate by 2029.
Glossary
Precise definitions for PPWR terminology. Legal definitions often differ from common usage.
ProducerArt. 3(1), point (15) PPWR
Any manufacturer, importer or distributor to which one of five independent tests applies, irrespective of the selling technique used. Limbs (a) and (b): established in a member state and making packaging, or products packaged in it, available for the first time from within that state and on that same territory. Limbs (c) and (d): established in a member state or a third country and making it available for the first time on the territory of another member state directly to end users. Limb (e): established in a member state and unpacking packaged products without being an end user, unless another person is the producer under (a) to (d).
Common misuse: reading the definition as a hierarchy in which the brand owner is the primary obligation holder and the importer stands in when there is no EU manufacturer. PPWR contains no such cascade; that is the pattern of the US state EPR laws, not of Regulation (EU) 2025/40. The limbs are independent, and because they turn on establishment, territory of first supply and whether the sale is direct to end users, the producer can differ per member state for the same product. Online marketplaces are not producers under PPWR; their duties sit in Art. 45(4) and (6). Source: Regulation (EU) 2025/40, Arts. 3(1)(15), 3(1)(23), 16, 19, 44 and 45, read in the OJ PDF on August 8, 2026 [LOCKED].
Packaging Types (Primary / Secondary / Tertiary / Service)Art. 3(1) PPWR
Primary: packaging constituting a sales unit to the final consumer. Secondary: grouping packaging for a number of sales units. Tertiary: transport/industrial packaging. Service packaging: provided to consumer at point of sale (e.g., carrier bags, takeaway cups).
Recyclability Grade A/B/CArt. 6 + ACT-02 (pending)
A classification of packaging recyclability by weight. Grade A = 95 percent or more (enabling the largest EPR fee discounts), Grade B = 80 percent or more, Grade C = 70 percent or more. Below 70 percent is non-recyclable and cannot be placed on the EU market from January 1, 2030.
Exact criteria are pending ACT-02 (Delegated Act on Design for Recycling). No final technical thresholds published as of August 4, 2026.
Post-Consumer Recycled (PCR) ContentArt. 7 PPWR
Material recovered from waste generated by households or commercial/institutional facilities after use by end consumers. PPWR sets mandatory minimum PCR content targets by polymer type from January 1, 2030.
Distinct from post-industrial / pre-consumer recycled content. Only PCR content counts toward PPWR targets. Methodology for verification: pending ACT-03.
Mass Balance AccountingArt. 7 + ACT-03 (pending)
A chain-of-custody methodology that allows recycled feedstock inputs to be allocated to specific outputs without requiring physical separation throughout production. Relevant to chemical recycling credits for PCR content claims.
Heavily contested. NGOs argue mass balance overstates actual recycled content. Industry argues it is essential for chemical recycling viability. ACT-03 will define the permissible methodology.
Declaration of Conformity (DoC)Arts. 5โ€“12 PPWR
A formal written document attesting that a packaging format meets applicable PPWR requirements. Required for all packaging placed on the EU market from August 12, 2026. Must cover minimization, recyclability, PCR content, PFAS/SoC compliance, and reuse classification.
No direct US equivalent. Some DoC fields (recyclability grade) require data not yet finalizable pending ACT-02.
Authorized Representative (AR)Art. 3(29) + national requirements
A natural or legal person established in the EU, mandated by a non-EU producer to fulfill EPR registration and compliance obligations on the producer's behalf in a specific member state.
Austria requires an AR for all non-resident producers regardless of volume. The Environmental Omnibus proposal would suspend the AR requirement for EU-established producers until Jan 1, 2035; the EPR provisions were dropped from the Council negotiating mandate on June 24, 2026, so the suspension is stalled and not adopted.
Eco-ModulationArt. 6(8) PPWR (framework: Art. 6(4)(d))
Mandatory adjustment of EPR fees based on the environmental performance of packaging. Member states must ensure PROs apply higher fees to less recyclable, lower-recycled-content packaging and lower fees to more sustainable formats.
France's CITEO bonus/malus is the most developed example: up to โ€“50% bonus for best-practice design, up to +100% malus for worst-performing formats.
EPR / PROArt. 44โ€“49 PPWR
Extended Producer Responsibility: policy requiring producers to bear financial responsibility for end-of-life management of their packaging. A PRO (Producer Responsibility Organization) is the collective scheme through which producers fulfill EPR obligations (e.g., CITEO, CONAI, Verpact, ARA).
Deposit Return System (DRS)Art. 50 PPWR
A system where consumers pay a deposit on beverage containers at point of sale, refunded when the container is returned to a collection point. PPWR mandates DRS in all 27 member states by January 1, 2029 for single-use plastic and metal beverage containers between 0.1L and 3L.
Digital Product Passport (DPP)ESPR, not PPWR
A digital record of a product's composition and compliance data, reached through a data carrier. The DPP is created by the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), not by the PPWR. PPWR Art. 12 requires a harmonized sorting label plus, in defined cases, a QR code or other standardized open digital-marking technology; it does not mandate a packaging DPP. A packaging DPP would arrive only through ESPR delegated acts. Art. 13 governs the labeling of waste receptacles, not product passports. Scope boundary: PPWR vs ESPR and the DPP. [SIGNALED]
Substances of Concern (SoC)Art. 3(12) + Annex I PPWR
Hazardous substances present in packaging that may impair human health or hinder recycling. Includes PFAS and the heavy metals restricted under Art. 5(4). Annex I is the indicative list of what counts as packaging, not a list of substances. PFAS in food-contact packaging banned from Aug 12, 2026 (>25 ppb individual, >250 ppb sum, >50 ppm total including polymeric, Art. 5(5)).
Design for Recycling (DfR)Art. 6 + ACT-02 (pending)
Technical design criteria that packaging must meet to qualify for specific recyclability grades. Covers material composition, colorants, labels, adhesives, closures, barrier coatings, and separability. Exact criteria pending ACT-02 adoption.
PFAS (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances)Art. 5(5) PPWR
A class of approximately 4,700 synthetic fluorinated compounds. PPWR bans PFAS in food-contact packaging from August 12, 2026 at three limits under Art. 5(5): 25 ppb for any individual PFAS and 250 ppb for the sum of PFAS, both by targeted analysis excluding polymeric PFAS, and 50 ppm for total PFAS including polymeric PFAS. Where total fluorine exceeds 50 mg/kg, suppliers must on request evidence the split between PFAS and non-PFAS fluorine. Common in grease-resistant coatings on paper cups, fast-food wrappers, and microwave packaging.
PFAS testing and reformulation lead times are typically 12โ€“18 months. Brands that have not started this process are now operating very close to the deadline.
Green Dot (Der Grรผne Punkt)Art. 12(9) + 12(8) PPWR
The interlocking green arrows symbol historically used to indicate EPR fee payment to a national scheme. Two provisions bite, at different times. Article 12(9) is the operative one: from February 12, 2027, packaging in an EPR scheme may be identified only by a symbol carried in a QR code or other standardized open digital-marking technology. Read it precisely: Art. 12(9) does not compel anyone to mark EPR participation, it restricts the means. The practical effect is that a standalone printed EPR-fee mark can no longer serve that purpose. [LOCKED] on the date and the mechanism, read verbatim in the OJ text. Article 12(8) separately restricts marks, symbols or inscriptions that could mislead or confuse consumers about packaging waste management; it applies from August 12, 2026 and its practical reach widens on August 12, 2028 when the harmonized label itself applies, because it is scope-limited to matters for which PPWR lays down harmonized labeling. It may not be used as a recycling instruction symbol.
Harmonized Sorting PictogramArt. 13 + ACT-04 (pending)
A standardized EU-wide graphical symbol indicating how a packaging component should be sorted. Replaces national sorting labels (e.g., France's Triman, Italy's alphanumeric codes). Required on consumer packaging from August 12, 2028. Visual format pending ACT-04.
Compostable PackagingArt. 3(34) + Art. 9 + ACT-05 (pending)
Packaging that can be organically recovered through composting. PPWR distinguishes industrial compostable from home compostable. Permitted only for specific applications (e.g., tea bags, coffee capsules, some fresh food wrapping). Technical criteria pending ACT-05.
Italy filed TRIS notification 2026/0167/IT seeking exemption for compostable single-use food-service packaging. EC response still pending as of August 4, 2026.
Void Space / Minimization RuleArt. 24 and Art. 10 PPWR
Two separate duties, often confused. Empty space: for grouped, transport, and e-commerce packaging the void-space ratio may not exceed 50% from January 1, 2030, or 3 years after the Art. 24(2) implementing acts, whichever is later (Art. 24(1)); the calculation methodology is due February 12, 2028. Sales packaging is not covered by that cap, but Art. 24(4) requires its empty space to be reduced to the functional minimum from February 12, 2028. Minimization: Art. 10(1) requires weight and volume to be reduced to the minimum necessary for functionality, and applies from January 1, 2030. Minimization is not absent before then; Art. 70(1)(b) keeps the Directive 94/62/EC essential requirements and EN 13428:2004 in force until December 31, 2029.
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)Not directly applicable under PPWR
A methodology for quantifying environmental impacts across a product's full life cycle. PPWR does not currently permit LCA-based arguments to override its specific format bans or reuse exemptions.
Common misconception: brands sometimes assume an LCA showing single-use outperforms reusable will earn an exemption. PPWR is prescriptive, LCA is not currently a permitted compliance pathway.

PPWR article finder

The articles compliance teams are most often handed by a customer, a lawyer or a supplier. Each links to a full page with the compliance date, who it binds, and the EUR-Lex text.
Delegated and Implementing Acts Tracker
Live status tracker for PPWR secondary legislation, where the technical details are actually defined. Each act shows its status, due date, evidence label, last-verified date, and what it does to your fees or formats.
๐Ÿ• Tracker last verified: August 4, 2026 (all nine statuses re-checked against EUR-Lex and the Commission Have Your Say register; no act has been adopted)
Why this matters: PPWR's broad requirements are in force from Aug 12, 2026, but many specific technical thresholds (recyclability grades, PCR methodology, DfR criteria) are defined in delegated and implementing acts, most of which are still pending. Of the 9 tracked acts below, none is marked Adopted; none has a EUR-Lex OJ publication as of the last verification. Separately, the first PPWR delegated act was adopted by the Commission on February 25, 2026: Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2026/429, exempting certain operators using pallet wrappings and straps from the 100 percent transport-packaging reuse targets, now published in the Official Journal (OJ L, 2026/429). The Commission has also published its official interpretive guidance in the Official Journal (Commission Notice C/2026/3084, June 10, 2026). Compliance planning should account for the risk that these acts may be published on short notice. Six corrigenda to Regulation (EU) 2025/40 have appeared in the Official Journal to date (May 22, 2025; September 9, 2025; November 25, 2025; November 28, 2025; July 21, 2026; and August 4, 2026). Each corrects one or more language versions other than English. There has never been an English-language corrigendum, and none has changed the English operative text [LOCKED, the May 22, 2025 (FR) and August 4, 2026 (DE) corrigenda read in full in the OJ PDF; the other four confirmed on EUR-Lex by OJ reference; checked against the EN text of Arts. 3(1)(66), 24(2), 29(4)(b), 29(6) and 47(1)].
ACT-01
Reuse Targets, Calculation Methodology (Art. 30(3))
The reuse targets themselves are self-executing in Article 29 (transport and e-commerce packaging 40% from 2030; beverages 10% from 2030; endeavour targets 70% and 40% from 2040). What is pending is the Article 30(3) implementing act defining how the targets are calculated and measured.
Consequence: Determines how the Art. 29 percentages are counted (qualifying systems, trip counting, exemptions), which drives reuse-system planning for beverage and e-commerce brands ahead of the 2030 deadline. No direct fee effect.
Due: June 30, 2027 Status: Pending, not adopted Evidence: LOCKED deadline (Art. 30(3), EUR-Lex read); SIGNALED status Last verified: 2026-08-04 Source: Art. 30(3) in Reg 2025/40
Pending
ACT-02
Design for Recycling (DfR) Criteria + Recyclability Grade A/B/C Methodology (Art. 6(4))
Defines the technical criteria for each recyclability grade (A, B, C) across all packaging material categories. Determines which formats fall below Grade C (and cannot be placed on the market from 2030, or 24 months after this act enters into force, whichever is the latest) and which earn Grade A fee discounts. JRC methodology work in development; not yet published for public consultation. The technical basis for these criteria is EN 18120:2026, the CEN design-for-recycling standard for plastic packaging (mandate M/584). It is voluntary until ACT-02 makes the method binding. See the Format Risk Screener for per-format traffic-light reads.
โš ๏ธ Blocks: EPR fee grade calculation, DoC recyclability field, packaging design investment decisions, non-recyclable (below Grade C) market-access planning
Consequence: The single most fee-relevant pending act. It delivers the Art. 6(4)(d) eco-modulation framework keyed to the Art. 45(1) EPR obligation, and starts the Art. 6(8) clock: harmonized grade-based fee modulation becomes mandatory in all 27 member states 18 months after both the Art. 6(4) and Art. 6(5) acts enter into force (roughly mid-2031 on the statutory deadlines), and grade assignments decide 2030 market access for every format in the Format Risk Screener.
Due: January 1, 2028 Status: In preparation Evidence: LOCKED deadline (Art. 6(4), EUR-Lex read); SIGNALED status Last verified: 2026-08-04 Source: Art. 6(4) in Reg 2025/40
In Preparation
ACT-03
PCR Content Calculation Methodology, implementing act (Art. 7(8))
An implementing act under Art. 7(8), adopted by the Art. 65(2) examination procedure, not a delegated act. Defines how post-consumer recycled content must be calculated, verified, and certified, and sets the Annex VII technical documentation format. Determines whether mass balance accounting is permissible for chemical recycling inputs. Contested by NGOs and chemical recycling industry. Its timing moves the Art. 7(1) targets: those apply from 1 January 2030 or 3 years after this act enters into force, whichever is the latest.
โš ๏ธ Blocks: PCR target compliance claims, chemical recycling credit eligibility, PCR supply contract structuring
Consequence: Decides which recycled inputs count toward the Art. 7(1) 2030 minimums (30/10/30/35 by category), so it directly sets the compliance cost of PCR sourcing, whether chemical-recycling credits are usable, and eligibility for national PCR fee bonuses (Verpact 200 EUR/t discount, CITEO PCR prime, Ecoembes 20%+ PCR bonus).
Due: December 31, 2026 (Art. 7(8)) Register: Commission Have Your Say initiative 18753, stage "In preparation", adoption targeted Q4 2026. The separate Art. 7(10) third-country equivalence act is initiative 18752; the Art. 7(9) sustainability-criteria delegated act has no register entry. Status: Not published Evidence: SIGNALED Last verified: 2026-08-04 Source: Art. 7 in Reg 2025/40
Not Published
ACT-04
Harmonized Labeling Implementing Act, Sorting Pictograms (Art. 12(6)/(7))
Defines the visual format, sizing, placement, and color specifications for EU-wide harmonized sorting pictograms replacing national labeling schemes from August 12, 2028.
โš ๏ธ Blocks: Artwork planning for the 2028 label transition; national labels (Triman, IT alphanumeric) remain in force until adopted
Consequence: Starts the 24-month clock to the harmonized label (applies Aug 12, 2028, or 24 months after this act if later), and widens the reach of the Art. 12(8) misleading-marks restriction, which has applied since August 12, 2026 and reaches only matters for which PPWR lays down harmonized labeling. Note that the Art. 12(9) digital-only rule for EPR-scheme marks such as the Green Dot runs on its own clock and applies from February 12, 2027 regardless of this act. Late adoption pushes the whole labeling timeline. As of August 4, 2026 there is no draft act, no Have Your Say initiative and no public consultation, so the August 12, 2026 statutory deadline will be missed and the 2028 label date should be read as a floor, not a fixed point. The only preparatory output is JRC technical proposal JRC141706 of January 13, 2026, which covers Art. 12(6) and Art. 13(2). Artwork and inventory cost effect, no fee-rate effect.
Due: August 12, 2026 Status: Deadline will be missed Evidence: LOCKED deadline (Art. 12, EUR-Lex read); SIGNALED status Last verified: 2026-08-04 Source: Art. 12 in Reg 2025/40
Pending
ACT-05
Compostable Packaging Harmonized Standards, standardization request (Art. 9(6))
Not a delegated or implementing act. Article 9 empowers neither. What Art. 9(6) requires is a Commission request to the European standardization organizations, due 12 February 2026, to prepare or update harmonized standards for industrial and home compostability, covering retention times, temperatures and stirring. The permitted application categories are set directly in Art. 9(1) and 9(2) and already bind; Art. 9(5) allows the Commission to propose extending them by legislative proposal. Related to Italy TRIS notification 2026/0167/IT.
โš ๏ธ Blocks: Compostable packaging investment decisions; Italy TRIS outcome interacts with this act
Consequence: Decides which formats (coffee capsules, tea bags, fruit stickers, light carrier bags) may or must be compostable, which determines whether bioplastic SKUs stay marketable and how they are priced under schemes like Italy's Biorepack (246 EUR/t from July 2026).
Due: February 12, 2026 (Art. 9(6) standardization request) Status: In consultation Evidence: SIGNALED Last verified: 2026-08-04 Source: Art. 9 in Reg 2025/40
Consultation
ACT-06
Reusable Packaging Minimum Rotations, delegated act (Art. 11(2))
A genuine delegated act, one of only two here, listed in the Art. 64 empowerments. Art. 11(2) requires the Commission to establish a minimum number of rotations for the packaging formats most frequently reused, taking hygiene and logistics into account. The wider reusability criteria (emptying, unloading, refilling, reconditioning, recyclability) are set directly in Art. 11(1) and already bind.
Consequence: Sets the bar for what counts as reusable, which gates both the Art. 29 reuse targets and the large national reuse fee incentives (for example CITEO's reuse bonus, up to a full contribution discount for proven reuse systems).
Due: February 12, 2027 (Art. 11(2)) Status: Not published Evidence: SIGNALED Last verified: 2026-08-04 Source: Art. 11 in Reg 2025/40
Not Published
ACT-07
DRS Minimum Requirements, already in the regulation (Annex X)
Not a pending act. Article 50 empowers no delegated or implementing act. The DRS minimum requirements are set directly in Annex X and are already law. They apply from 1 January 2029 to systems established after entry into force; systems established earlier are grandfathered if they hit the 90 percent target by 1 January 2029, and otherwise must comply by 1 January 2035. Annex X does not apply in the outermost regions. The only act in this area is the Art. 56(7)(a) implementing act on reporting and calculation.
Consequence: Shapes deposit-marking and interoperability requirements for beverage formats ahead of the January 1, 2029 all-27 DRS mandate; affects label artwork and cross-border SKU planning in the 9 member states without an operating DRS. No EPR fee effect.
Due: n/a, Annex X is already in force Status: Not yet started Evidence: SIGNALED Last verified: 2026-08-04 Source: Art. 50 in Reg 2025/40
Not Yet Started
ACT-08
Harmonized EPR Registration Format (Art. 44(14))
Required to establish a standardized registration format enabling producers to register across all 27 member states using a single data structure. Intended to reduce administrative burden of multi-country EPR compliance.
โš ๏ธ Statutory deadline of February 12, 2026 was MISSED. Still not published as of August 4, 2026, roughly six months late. Producers must continue registering individually in each member state using national PRO formats.
Consequence: Until adopted, every producer registers separately in each member state on national PRO formats, the biggest recurring admin cost for multi-country and non-EU sellers (27 registrations, 27 data structures). No fee-rate effect, pure compliance burden.
Due: February 12, 2026 (missed) Register: Commission Have Your Say initiative 15352, stage "In preparation", adoption was planned for Q1 2026 and has slipped. Knock-on: Art. 44(1) gives member states 18 months from this act's adoption to conform their national registers, so that clock has not started. Status: Overdue Evidence: LOCKED deadline (Art. 44(14)); SIGNALED status Last verified: 2026-08-04 Source: Art. 44(14) in Reg 2025/40
Overdue
ACT-09
Digital Marking Methodology, implementing acts (Art. 12(7))
Defines the technical specification for the QR code or other standardized open digital-marking technology that carries packaging marking information, the minimum data it must convey, and interoperability standards. Do not confuse the ACT deadline with the obligation date: the Art. 12(7) implementing acts are due 12 August 2026, while the Art. 12(1) labeling obligation they unlock runs from 12 August 2028 or 24 months after these acts, whichever is the latest. The second subparagraph of Art. 12(7), the substances-of-concern marking methodology, is due 1 January 2030. This is PPWR digital marking under Art. 12, not an ESPR Digital Product Passport.
Consequence: Determines the QR/data-carrier spec that must sit alongside (or carry) the 2028 harmonized label, including where a fee-paid symbol like the Green Dot may still appear (inside the QR only). Artwork and data-systems cost, no fee-rate effect.
Due: August 12, 2026 for material composition; January 1, 2030 for the substances-of-concern methodology (Art. 12(7)) Status: Not yet started Evidence: SIGNALED Last verified: 2026-08-04 Source: Art. 13 in Reg 2025/40
Not Yet Started
Format Risk Screener
Quick recyclability and compliance risk lookup by packaging format, now with an EN 18120 design-for-recycling score per format.

Design for Recycling: Grade Ladder (preview)

PPWR Annex II grades packaging recyclability by weight (Grades A, B, C only; below 70 percent is non-recyclable). The per-category technical criteria are pending the design-for-recycling delegated act (ACT-02, due Jan 1, 2028), so the assignments below are provisional, for orientation only.

Market-access ladder: from Jan 1, 2030 packaging must reach at least Grade C to be placed on the EU market; from Jan 1, 2035 the recyclable-at-scale test applies; from Jan 1, 2038 only Grade A or B is permitted.

Grade A: 95%+

Largest EPR fee discounts. Clear PET bottles, natural HDPE, aluminum cans, glass, uncoated kraft board.

Grade B: 80%+

Moderate discount. PP tubs, mono-material PE flexibles where collection exists.

Grade C: 70%+

Minimum to stay on the market from 2030, or 24 months after the Art. 6(4) act, whichever is the latest. Beverage cartons, some flexibles, coated fiber.

Below Grade C

Non-recyclable. Off the market from 2030. Multilayer laminates, PVC, carbon-black plastic, EPS.

Risk ratings reflect current best assessment based on PPWR text and JRC draft guidance. ACT-02 (DfR criteria) has not been finalized, so exact Grade A/B/C assignments are pending. PPWR Annex II defines only Grades A, B, and C; packaging below 70 percent recyclability is non-recyclable. Use for planning; verify against ACT-02 once adopted.

Format risk ratings, with EN 18120 design read

Each format card shows two reads: a PPWR recyclability risk rating (the badge on the right, based on the PPWR text and JRC draft guidance), and an EN 18120:2026 design-for-recycling traffic-light for plastic formats. EN 18120 (CEN/TC 261/SC 4/WG 10) is the new European Design for Recycling standard for plastic packaging; it classifies design features by compatibility with real recycling infrastructure: Green compatible, Yellow limited, Red incompatible. Developed under Commission mandate M/584 to feed the PPWR method, it is voluntary for now and covers plastics only, so non-plastic formats show Out of scope. The traffic-light is an indicative design screen, not the binding PPWR grade; the legal method is the pending Article 6(4) delegated act (ACT-02, due Jan 1, 2028).

What drives a format risk rating

These are the design factors the screener scores against. They are public recycling-infrastructure principles, not the per-format ratings, and they are worth knowing before you unlock the screener. Full detail at ppwratlas.com/format-risk-screener/.

๐Ÿ”“

See the full screener

You are previewing the risk screener. Add your details to unlock every format, the search, and the full risk detail.

We use your details to give you access and to respond to you. See our privacy terms. Only tick the box if you want email updates.
Clear PET Bottle (beverage)
Mono-material clear or light-blue PET, separable closure. Standard beverage bottle format.
EPR: Lower rate under eco-modulation. DRS: In scope in DE, NL, FI, SE, DK, EE, LV, LT, HR, RO, SK, HU, IE and others.
EN 18120: Green Parts 4/10 (PET bottles). Mono-material clear PET with a separable closure, the reference recyclable design.
Grade A Likely
HDPE Rigid Container (natural/white)
Milk bottles, detergent bottles, shampoo containers in natural HDPE. Mono-material, sortable.
EPR: Lower eco-modulation rate. Favored format for DfR compliance.
EN 18120: Green Parts 6/12 (PE/PP rigid). Mono-material natural HDPE, NIR-sortable.
Grade A/B Likely
Aluminum Beverage Can
Standard aluminum can. Highly recyclable, established collection infrastructure across EU.
EPR: Lower rate. DRS: In scope across most active DRS markets. PCR content achievable via closed-loop recycling.
EN 18120: Out of scope Plastic packaging only. Metal recyclability sits under EN 13430; well-established stream.
Grade A Likely
Glass Bottle / Jar
Standard soda-lime glass packaging. Well-established recycling stream across EU.
EPR: Lowest fee rates in most markets. DRS scope varies, excluded from some DRS systems.
EN 18120: Out of scope Plastic packaging only. Glass recyclability sits under EN 13430.
Grade A Likely
PP Rigid Container / Tub
Yogurt pots, margarine tubs, food containers in polypropylene.
EPR: Moderate eco-modulation rate. Clear/natural PP preferred. Label/sleeve compatibility important for grade.
EN 18120: Green Parts 6/12 (PE/PP rigid). Clear or natural PP is design-aligned; full-body sleeves or dark pigment move it to Yellow.
Grade B Likely
Mono-Material PE Flexible Pouch / Film
Stand-up or lay-flat pouch in a single polyethylene family, no barrier layers or foil laminate.
EPR: Medium rate. Grade B in markets with flexible PE infrastructure; Grade C where collection is limited. Market-dependent.
EN 18120: Yellow Parts 7/13 (PE/PP flexible). The mono-PE structure is design-aligned, but flexible-PE collection and sorting are immature in many markets.
Grade B/C, Market Dependent
Opaque / Dark-Pigmented PET Bottle or Container
PET packaging colored with dark or opaque pigments, including most black-pigmented containers.
FR: CITEO malus up to +100%. DE: Higher dual-system fee for non-recyclable formats under the VerpackDG design-incentive structure. IT: High Corepla band. Carbon black prevents NIR sorting, high risk across EU.
EN 18120: Red Parts 4/5/10/11 plus Part 3 (sortability). Carbon black or dark pigment blocks NIR detection, so the pack fails sorting.
Grade C / Non-Recyclable Risk
Multi-Layer Flexible Laminate / Foil Pouch
Stand-up or flat pouches combining PE/PP/PET layers with aluminum foil or EVOH barrier. Non-separable composite.
Highest risk format. Non-separable composite is effectively unrecyclable. ACT-02 expected to classify it as non-recyclable (below Grade C). Malus in FR, high band in IT. 2030 market-access risk is high.
EN 18120: Red Parts 7/13 (PE/PP flexible). Non-separable multi-material and barrier layers are incompatible with mechanical recycling.
Non-Recyclable Risk, 2030 Market Ban
Expanded Polystyrene (EPS), Food Contact
EPS foam trays, cups, boxes for food service or perishable packaging.
SUP Directive restrictions apply to some food-service EPS formats. Non-recyclable (below Grade C) risk under ACT-02. Limited collection infrastructure. High malus in eco-modulation systems.
EN 18120: Red Parts 9/15 (EPS). Sparse collection and sorting plus food-contact contamination make it incompatible in practice.
Non-Recyclable Risk
PVC Packaging (clamshell, blister)
Rigid PVC clamshells and blister packs for retail consumer electronics, hardware, food.
PVC is incompatible with most plastic recycling streams. Below Grade C in draft JRC guidance. Design substitution to PET clamshell strongly recommended.
EN 18120: Red No dedicated EN 18120 part; the protocols treat PVC as a cross-stream disruptor. Substitute to PET.
Below Grade C, Substitution Needed
PFAS-Coated Paper / Board (cups, wrappers, trays)
Paper cups, fast-food wrappers, bakery trays, microwave packaging with fluorinated grease-resistant coatings.
โ›” BANNED from Aug 12, 2026 if PFAS content exceeds 25 ppb individual, 250 ppb sum, or 50 ppm total including polymeric PFAS. Test all grease-resistant paper and board formats immediately. Reformulation lead time: 12โ€“18 months.
EN 18120: Out of scope Plastic packaging only; this is fiber-based. Also banned from Aug 12, 2026 above the PFAS limits regardless of recyclability.
BANNED Aug 2026
Composite Beverage Carton (aseptic / chilled)
Carton formats combining paperboard, PE layers, and aluminum foil (e.g., Tetra Pak, Elopak).
Recyclable in dedicated carton streams only. Grade C anticipated, composite structure impairs recyclability. Some markets lack dedicated carton collection.
EN 18120: Out of scope Fiber-based composite, outside EN 18120 (plastic only). Assess under fiber schemes (4evergreen) and dedicated carton streams.
Grade C Anticipated
Recycled Paperboard / Kraft Board Carton
Secondary and tertiary packaging in recycled paperboard. Widely collected. High PCR content often already present.
EPR: Lowest rates across all markets. Grade A likely. Barrier coatings (PE, wax) may reduce grade, specify barrier-free where possible.
EN 18120: Out of scope Plastic packaging only; this is fiber-based. Strong recyclability under EN 13430 and fiber schemes (4evergreen).
Grade A Likely
Compostable PLA / Bio-Based Plastic
Packaging from polylactic acid or other bio-based compostable materials. Often used for cups, trays, cutlery.
Bio-based origin does not determine PPWR recyclability grade. PLA not recyclable in standard plastic streams. Permitted only for specific applications (ACT-05 pending). Italy TRIS notification may affect scope.
EN 18120: Out of scope EN 18120 covers PET, PE, PP, PS and EPS, not PLA. PLA is a composting route, not recyclable in mainstream plastic streams.
Pending ACT-05
Carbon-Black Pigmented Plastic
Any plastic packaging colored with carbon black pigment (black trays, containers, lids).
Carbon black absorbs NIR light, invisible to NIR sorting equipment. CITEO malus applies. ACT-02 expected to classify it as non-recyclable (below Grade C). Substitute with carbon-black-free alternatives.
EN 18120: Red Part 3 (sortability). Carbon black absorbs NIR, so the pack is invisible to standard sorting. Use detectable pigments.
Non-Recyclable Risk
Full-Body Shrink Sleeve on PET/HDPE
PVC or PET shrink sleeve applied to a PET bottle for decoration/branding.
PVC sleeves on PET bottles: contamination risk, downcycles bottle. PET sleeves: better compatibility. Specify PET sleeve with perforation for easy removal.
EN 18120: Red Parts 4/5 (PET) plus label and sleeve criteria. A PVC or full-coverage sleeve is a disruptor (Red); a perforated PET sleeve is Yellow.
Grade C Risk (PVC sleeve)
Labeling Requirements
Consolidated view of PPWR packaging labeling: harmonized pictograms, deposit and reuse marks, the Green Dot transition, and surviving national marks. Evidence labels show how settled each item is.
Article 12 harmonized labeling. PPWR replaces the national label patchwork with a single EU label using pictograms for material composition and consumer sorting. The Commission implementing act that specifies the pictograms is due by August 12, 2026 [SIGNALED, not yet adopted as of August 4, 2026]. The harmonized label then applies from August 12, 2028, or 24 months after the act enters into force, whichever is later [LOCKED date].

Key Labeling Dates

DateRequirementEvidence

What Changes

Pictogram artwork and minimum sizes are not final until the Art. 12 implementing act publishes. Treat label redesign specifications as provisional until then. This section is updated when the act is adopted. Full detail at ppwratlas.com/labeling/.
About PPWR Atlas
Who builds and maintains this hub, the advisory work behind it, and how the data is kept current and trustworthy.

About the Author

I'm Dave Hartter, a packaging and product sustainability advisor based in Charlotte, NC, with more than 20 years of sustainability, R&D and quality experience inside global manufacturers. I view sustainability as a driver of business performance, not just a reporting requirement: understand the market and regulatory environment, identify the risks and opportunities, and build programs that go beyond compliance to drive business value.

As Director of Sustainability, I led product sustainability at Huber Engineered Materials, a division of J.M. Huber. There, I applied tools such as Life Cycle Assessment and Portfolio Sustainability Assessment to understand the regulatory environment, market trends, and customer requirements to drive sustainability into business decisions and customer messaging. At Newell Brands, I led the development of the packaging sustainability program from the ground up, from developing 2025 goals aligned to internal and external stakeholders to building out the tools, systems and training that delivered measurable results. Sustainability programs are only successful when cross-functional teams are engaged and empowered with the tools and training necessary to deliver on the goals.

Today, I advise manufacturers and packaging suppliers directly. The Atlas hubs are the public side of that work. I built them so teams spend less time getting up to speed and more time delivering results. Connect with me on LinkedIn.

Advisory Services

The Atlas provides the information necessary to understand what the PPWR requires and what it costs. Companies throughout the packaging supply chain can then understand the near and long-term risks and opportunities to their business. Whether your company is just starting to scope its PPWR obligations or already understands the financial impact of EU EPR fees and needs a customized strategy to reduce them, I can help.

Engagements I can help you with:

  • PPWR strategy and fee-reduction roadmaps: where your fees will land across EU markets, and which design, material, and data moves reduce them.
  • Design for recyclability: assessing a portfolio against the PPWR recyclability grades and eco-modulation criteria, and prioritizing the changes that pay back.
  • LCA and packaging sustainability programs: building the measurement and design capability in-house, from a first LCA to portfolio coverage.
  • Regulatory readiness: registration, Authorized Representative appointment, reporting, and data requirements, and getting a company through its first compliance cycle without surprises.

If you are working to future-proof your product and packaging portfolio, let's talk: info@hartteradvisory.com

About the Site

The EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation is moving fast and is difficult to keep up with. Regulation (EU) 2025/40 applies from August 12, 2026, its recyclability, recycled-content, labeling, reuse, and deposit return rules phase in through a series of delegated and implementing acts, and national EPR schemes each modulate fees their own way. Most coverage assumes you already know what you're doing, or sits behind a consulting paywall. Sustainability, packaging, and regulatory leaders needed one trusted place that tracks all of it, stays current, and is free to use.

That is what PPWR Atlas is: a live intelligence hub covering deadlines, recyclability grades, eco-modulation, EPR fees, labeling, and the pending delegated acts across the EU and its key national markets, updated weekly from primary and trusted sources.

How the data is maintained

Regulatory data is only useful if you can trust it and if it's current, so PPWR Atlas runs on a few standing rules.

Every date, threshold, grade, and fee is tied to a primary source: the regulation text on EUR-Lex, an adopted delegated or implementing act, official Commission guidance, or a national PRO's published schedule. Each figure carries a visible evidence label, LOCKED for a settled rule, SIGNALED for one that is expected but not yet adopted, and SPECULATIVE for a projection, so you can see the difference between a rule that is fixed and one that is still forming. A national scheme's rule is never presented as a harmonized PPWR requirement.

The site is not to be viewed as legal advice. Rules change, and your obligations depend on the specifics of your company. Verify anything consequential against the primary sources or with qualified legal counsel before acting on it.

The other Atlases

PPWR Atlas is one of three regulatory intelligence sites:

  • PPWRAtlas.com: the EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (this site)
  • EPRAtlas.com: U.S. packaging Extended Producer Responsibility
  • ESPRAtlas.com: the EU Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation and Digital Product Passports
What's New
Recent PPWR developments from the last 60 days, split into regulatory and policy movement and site updates. Updated August 12, 2026. Every entry below has its own page: read the latest weekly update or browse the full dated archive.

Latest Regulatory & Policy

Regulatory & Policy August 12, 2026

PPWR Applies From Today in All 27 Member States

Regulation (EU) 2025/40 applies from today in all 27 member states. It is a regulation, not a directive, so it binds directly with no national law needed first. Four things start now rather than later: the PFAS restriction on food-contact packaging, which sets three limits that all apply together, 25 ppb for any single PFAS and 250 ppb for the sum, both excluding polymeric PFAS, plus 50 ppm for total PFAS including polymeric; the Declaration of Conformity under Art. 39; the deadline for non-EU producers to appoint an authorized representative under Art. 45(3); and Germany's VerpackDG. Art. 67(5) is the one exception and waits until February 12, 2029.

What this means for you. The duty exists today, everywhere, whether or not the member state has named an enforcement authority. Thirteen still have not. What is NOT due today is most of the headline material: recyclability grades, recycled content minimums, the empty space cap and the reuse targets all sit at 2030 or later, and every one of those dates is a floor that moves later if the act it depends on is late. Nothing you print today needs a harmonized sorting label.

What to do. Confirm your Declaration of Conformity exists and is signed. If you are outside the EU, confirm your authorized representative is appointed in writing, per member state. If you use fluorinated food-contact materials, ask suppliers for total fluorine evidence now, because that duty is triggered on request above 50 mg/kg. Source: Regulation (EU) 2025/40, Art. 71, OJ L, 2025/40, 22.1.2025 [LOCKED].

Regulatory & Policy August 12, 2026

Twelve Annulment Actions Against the PPWR Are Pending at the EU General Court

Twelve actions for annulment against the PPWR are pending before the EU General Court, filed during 2025 and confirmed on the EUR-Lex record for the Regulation as at August 11, 2026: T-197/25, T-236/25, T-237/25, T-238/25, T-239/25, T-241/25, T-242/25, T-243/25, T-244/25, T-247/25, T-248/25 and T-249/25. Seven ask the Court to strike the whole Regulation. The rest target specific provisions, and they cluster: Art. 50 and Annex X, the deposit and return system rules, in three cases; Art. 29, the reuse targets, in six; Art. 25 and Annex V, the restricted packaging formats, in four; and Art. 7, the recycled content minimums, in one.

What this means for you. Nothing changes today. A pending annulment action does not suspend a regulation, and none of these cases has been reported as winning interim relief, so every date on this site still stands and you should plan against all of them. What it does tell you is where the legal risk sits. The four provision groups under attack are, between them, most of the expensive part of the Regulation, and they are the parts whose detail is still being written in delegated and implementing acts. If your 2030 capital plan depends on a single reading of the reuse targets or the format bans, that plan carries more legal uncertainty than the text alone suggests.

What to do. Keep complying. Do not treat litigation as a reason to delay a 2030 program, because if a case fails you will have lost years. Do flag it to whoever signs off your capital spend. Source: EUR-Lex record for Regulation (EU) 2025/40, "Affected by case", read August 11, 2026: EUR-Lex CELEX 32025R0040. The case notices themselves have not been read, so the applicants and their arguments are not reported here [SIGNALED].

Regulatory & Policy August 12, 2026

The Labeling Implementing Act Missed Its Deadline, Which Pushes 2028 Back

Art. 12(6) and 12(7) required the Commission to adopt the harmonized labeling implementing acts by today. It has not. As at August 11, 2026 the EUR-Lex record for the Regulation lists no implementing act completing Art. 12, and the only act completing the Regulation at all is the pallet wrap exemption. The technical groundwork exists: the Commission's Joint Research Centre published a technical proposal for a harmonized sorting label in early 2026, taking a material-based approach built on pictograms, color coding and minimal text rather than the old alphanumeric codes.

What this means for you. The labeling obligation applies from August 12, 2028 or 24 months after those acts enter into force, whichever is later. That "whichever is later" is now doing the work. Every month the act slips, 2028 slips with it, so treat 2028 as a floor and not a deadline. The flip side is that you still do not know what the label will look like.

What to do. Do not commission final sorting-label artwork yet. Watch for the draft act and its consultation, because that is your only chance to comment on the pictogram set before it is fixed. Source: absence of any Art. 12 implementing act on the EUR-Lex record for Regulation (EU) 2025/40, read August 11, 2026: EUR-Lex CELEX 32025R0040. The JRC proposal has not been read in full, so no date or document number is stated for it [SIGNALED].

Regulatory & Policy August 4, 2026

Half the EU Has Not Named a PPWR Enforcement Authority, Eight Days Out

Article 40(3) requires every member state to tell the Commission which authorities apply and enforce the PPWR. As of August 4, fourteen have done so: Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Ireland, France, Croatia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, Slovenia and Sweden, plus Norway and the United Kingdom. Thirteen have not: Bulgaria, Greece, Spain, Italy, Cyprus, Latvia, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia and Finland. Luxembourg's designation is marked provisional pending national law.

What this means for you. Your obligations start on August 12 in every member state, whether or not an authority has been named. What changes is who comes asking and how soon. In the fourteen that have notified, expect questions and inspections to start on time. In Italy, Spain and Poland, three of the largest markets on this site, there is currently no published body to contact with a compliance question, no address for a Declaration of Conformity query, and no obvious route to resolve a dispute. That is a timing gap, not a holiday: the duty accrues from August 12 and enforcement catches up later.

What to do. Check the list before you file anything, because it is updated as notifications arrive. Where an authority exists, save the contact now rather than hunting for it during an inquiry. Note also that several countries split the role, so there is no single number to call: Estonia names three bodies, Ireland divides obligations article by article between the EPA, the Minister and local authorities, and the Netherlands names both ILT and Rijkswaterstaat with a dedicated mailbox at PPWR@ilent.nl. Current list: European Commission, PPWR implementation page. Source: European Commission PPWR implementation page, Article 40(3) notifications, read August 4, 2026 [LOCKED].

Regulatory & Policy August 4, 2026

A Sixth PPWR Corrigendum, in German, and Still Nothing Changes in English

The Official Journal published a German-language correction to Regulation (EU) 2025/40 on August 4, 2026. On page 59, Article 29(4)(b) now reads "Waren" (goods) where it previously read "Rohstoffe" (raw materials), in the clause exempting transport packaging that is custom-designed for the carriage of large-scale machinery, equipment and goods from the Article 29 reuse targets.

What this means for you. If you run compliance from the German text and read that exemption as covering machinery, equipment and raw materials only, it is broader than you thought and may now cover finished goods you ship in custom-built transport packaging. Nothing changes for anyone working from English: Article 29(4)(b) has read "commodities" since publication and is untouched.

The wider point. This is the sixth corrigendum to the PPWR, after May 22 2025, September 9 2025, November 25 2025, November 28 2025 and July 21 2026. Every one has corrected a language version other than English. There has never been an English-language corrigendum, and the English operative text stands exactly as published on January 22, 2025. If your team quotes the Regulation from a German, Spanish, Czech, Italian, Swedish or French text, re-check those quotations against the current version rather than a copy saved last year. Read it at EUR-Lex, OJ L, 2026/90654. Source: OJ L, 2026/90654, August 4, 2026, read in the OJ PDF [LOCKED].

Regulatory & Policy July 31, 2026

Commission Publishes a Second Edition of Its PPWR FAQ, Without Announcing It

DG Environment published a second edition of its PPWR FAQ through the Publications Office on July 31, 2026, with no announcement and no coverage in the trade or legal press. The record carries ISBN 978-92-68-42316-5, catalogue number KH-01-26-068-EN-N and DOI 10.2779/4868962, against ISBN 978-92-68-37678-2 for the March edition. It runs to 20 sections and 155 numbered questions across 69 pages, where the first edition had 19 sections and 50 pages, and every change is tagged NEW or UPDATED in the text itself. The DG ENV landing page still displays "30 March 2026" and still describes the March edition, yet its download link now returns a 302 to the new Publications Office record, so the change is invisible to anyone re-reading that page. Section XVI is entirely new and covers enforcement immediately after August 12, 2026. The Commission states that "the enforcement of the obligations applicable as from 12 August 2026 should not disrupt trade flows, supply chains or consumer access to goods", that Article 62 requires a Member State to first require the operator to end the non-compliance and give it an opportunity to correct before prohibiting, recalling or withdrawing packaging, and that market surveillance authorities should support responsible operators rather than follow a sanction-oriented approach. A new Section X question settles the stock question: packaging produced before August 12, 2026 but not yet placed on the market does not have to be destroyed, remanufactured or relabeled, and "Packaging that has been placed on the market before 12 August 2026 can remain on the market, even if it is non-compliant with PPWR." Section VII states that "Both Article 10(1) and (2) apply by 1 January 2030. Until the end of 2029, the essential requirements from the PPWD continue to apply", which independently confirms the Article 10 minimization position this Atlas corrected on July 30. Section II grew from 8 questions to 15, adding manufacturer and producer tests for transport packaging and branded packaging and the ruling that envelopes containing correspondence are not packaging while empty envelopes are. Section III adds three questions on how to demonstrate compliance, pointing to Annex C of EN 13428:2004 for Article 5(1) and CEN report CR 13695-1/2000 for the Article 5(4) heavy-metal limits. Section XVIII adds one question, confirming that Article 44(5) lets a Member State require information beyond the PPWR list where that is necessary and proportionate for monitoring EPR compliance. Read this as a Commission interpretive document, not as the Official Journal text. It says so itself: "This document complements the Commission Notice - Guidance document for Regulation 2025/40 (EU) on packaging and packaging waste." [LOCKED] on what the Commission says, read in the PDF on August 3, 2026. Not [LOCKED] on what the Regulation requires; for that, Regulation (EU) 2025/40 governs.

Regulatory & Policy July 29, 2026

Three August 12 Points That Are Easy to Miss

With two weeks to go, three points sit in the detail rather than the headline dates. First, recyclability. The A, B, C grades are a 2030 obligation, but the recyclability requirement itself is not: the Commission guidance states that Article 6(1) "applies from 12 August 2026," with compliance measured against the old Directive and EN 13430:2004 until the Article 6(4) act lands. Second, stock. There is no transitional period for exhausting stocks, but packaging already placed on the market "may remain on the market and does not need to be withdrawn," and placing on the market is the transfer of ownership or possession, with imports timestamped at release for free circulation. Third, the previous Directive. Article 70 repeals Directive 94/62/EC from August 12 but keeps parts of it running to 2028 and 2029, and Decision 97/129/EC on material identification codes survives to August 2028. The full detail, with citations, is on the Prepare for PPWR tab. Sources: Reg (EU) 2025/40 Arts. 6, 70; Commission Notice C/2026/3084, June 10, 2026 [LOCKED].

Regulatory & Policy July 27, 2026

Deposit Systems Post First Hard Numbers

Two live deposit return systems published performance data this month. Romania's RetuRO reported more than 2.4 billion containers returned in the first half of 2026, an 82 percent return rate, up three points year on year, with coverage now reaching 92 percent of localities above 1,500 inhabitants. Portugal's Volta, live since April 10, 2026, passed 100 million containers returned and an estimated 38 percent collection rate by the end of July, running more than 2,500 automated collection points. Both figures matter as benchmarks for the member states that must stand up a system by January 1, 2029 under Article 50. Source: RetuRO H1 2026 barometer, July 27, 2026; SDR Portugal, July 21, 2026 [SIGNALED].

Regulatory & Policy July 21, 2026

The July PPWR Corrigendum, and Still No Change to the English Text

The Official Journal published a corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2025/40 on July 21, 2026 correcting the Spanish language version of recitals 130 and 131, Article 3(1)(66) and Article 47(1), replacing "sistema de responsabilidad ampliada del productor" with "organizacion competente en materia de responsabilidad del productor." It is the fifth corrigendum to the PPWR, following corrections published on May 22, 2025, September 9, 2025, November 25, 2025 and November 28, 2025. Every one has corrected a language version other than English. The English text of Article 3(1)(66) already reads "producer responsibility organisation" and the English Articles 24(2) and 29(6) already carry the corrected wording, so nothing in the English operative text has moved. If you work from a Spanish or French text, re-check your quotations against the consolidated version. Read it at EUR-Lex, OJ L of July 21, 2026. Source: OJ L, 2026/90604, July 21, 2026 [LOCKED].

Regulatory & Policy July 8, 2026

Spain's Deposit Authorization Stalls at Regional Level

Spain's own deposit mandate under Real Decreto 1055/2022 carries a November 2026 statutory deadline, and the process to authorize an operator has stopped. MITECO reports that between June 29 and July 8, 2026 the Madrid regional coordination commission issued three requests for supplementary documentation without transmitting them to the four applicant deposit operators, leaving the authorizations unresolved. More than 130 organizations have written to the regional government about the blockage. Spanish producers should plan on the November 2026 date slipping, with the PPWR Article 50 mandate of January 1, 2029 as the binding EU backstop. Source: MITECO procedural record and Spanish reporting, June to July 2026 [SIGNALED].

Fees July 7, 2026

Verpact Publishes 2027 Rate Bandwidths for the Netherlands

Verpact set indicative bandwidths for its 2027 Dutch packaging EPR tariffs. Glass, paper and board, wood, other metals and the system contribution are stable; beverage cartons and aluminium rise; plastic is held flat despite cost increases. Final 2027 rates follow in September 2026. The notable change is a new eco-modulation deduction rewarding recyclate sourced from European countries and customs zones, scaling with recyclate share, on top of the existing 20 cent per kg recycled-content discount. Deposit producer contributions rise for both plastic bottles and cans. Current rates: verpact.nl/nl/tarieven. Source: Verpact, July 7, 2026 [LOCKED].

Fees July 2, 2026

Ecoembes Publishes Its 2027 Spanish Schedule Early

Ecoembes has published full 2027 Punto Verde prices and its rate page now leads with 2027 rather than 2026, unusually early in the year. Headline 2027 domestic lines: PET beverage bottles up to 3L at 0.278 EUR/kg, other PET bottles 0.267, PET trays and other rigid items 0.682, HDPE rigid 0.282, other rigid plastics 0.773, flexible film 1.269, paper and cardboard 0.117, beverage cartons 0.544, steel 0.197, aluminium 0.040. Spanish household producers can model 2027 exposure now. Note that Ecoembes covers household packaging only; glass sits with Ecovidrio and industrial and commercial packaging with Envalora and the other industrial schemes. Rates: ecoembesempresas.com/precios. Source: Ecoembes Precios 2027 sheet, document dated July 2, 2026 [LOCKED].

Regulatory & Policy June 30, 2026

France Sets a January 1, 2029 Deposit Deadline

At the June 30, 2026 plenary session of the Plan plastique consultation, France's ecology minister stated that a deposit for recycling will be mandatory from January 1, 2029, framing it as "anticipate or endure" and citing a 58.4 percent beverage container collection rate in 2024 against a 90 percent goal. Local authority associations and NGOs walked out of the session, and the Senate committee had formally opposed the measure on May 19, 2026, so the delivery route is contested even though the date is now on the record. The date is corroborated in a Senate written question of May 28, 2026. France moves from "developing a DRS" to a dated national commitment. Source: French Ministry for Ecological Transition consultation, June 30, 2026 [SIGNALED].

Regulatory & Policy July 17, 2026

Germany's VerpackDG Enters the Statute Book

Germany promulgated its Packaging Law Implementation Act (Verpackungsdurchfรผhrungsgesetz, VerpackDG) in the Federal Law Gazette on July 17, 2026 (Bundesgesetzblatt Teil I 2026 Nr. 207). The act adapts national packaging law to Regulation (EU) 2025/40 and replaces the old Verpackungsgesetz (VerpackG); its core provisions take effect August 12, 2026, in parallel with the PPWR. The Bundestag adopted it June 11, 2026 and the Bundesrat approved it July 10, 2026, after the European Commission withdrew its notification objections on May 29, 2026. Notable national changes include an expanded system-participation obligation (now reaching certain primary-production and transport packaging), a new authorization requirement for producers of non-system-participation packaging, and a transition rule keeping existing system participations valid until December 31, 2026; the LUCID register continues, to be aligned once the PPWR Article 44(14) registration-format act is adopted. Source: Bundesgesetzblatt I 2026 Nr. 207, July 17, 2026 LOCKED.

Regulatory & Policy June 24, 2026

Council Drops EPR Provisions from Environmental Omnibus Mandate

On June 24, 2026 the Council agreed a partial negotiating mandate on the Environmental Omnibus covering industrial emissions, circular economy, and geospatial data. The extended producer responsibility provisions, including the proposed suspension of the Article 45(3) Authorized Representative requirement for EU-established producers until 2035 (COM/2025/982), did not secure agreement and were removed from the mandate. The suspension cannot proceed to trilogue as drafted; the Presidency continues work. Non-EU producers were never covered and must still appoint an AR by August 12, 2026. Source: Council of the EU press release, June 24, 2026.

Regulatory & Policy June 10, 2026

PPWR Guidance Document Published in the Official Journal

The European Commission's guidance document for Regulation (EU) 2025/40 was published in the Official Journal on June 10, 2026 as Commission Notice C/2026/3084 (adopted June 5, 2026 as C(2026) 3702 final). It formalizes the guidance first released March 30, 2026 and covers definitions, the PFAS food-contact restriction, recyclability, recycled content, labeling, reuse, DRS, and compostable packaging. It is now the authoritative interpretive reference ahead of the August 12, 2026 application date. Read it at EUR-Lex, C/2026/3084. Source: EUR-Lex, C/2026/3084, June 10, 2026.

Site Updates

Site Update August 12, 2026

Correction: the Private Label Rule Has a Small Business Exception

If you sell under your own brand and you are a very small business, the packaging obligation may not be yours. We had this wrong in two places and have corrected it.

The general rule is that putting your brand on packaging makes you the manufacturer, which is why private label normally lands on the retailer rather than the factory. There is one exception. If the brand owner is a micro-enterprise and its packaging supplier is in the same member state, the obligation belongs to the supplier instead. Both of those have to be true at once. A micro-enterprise buying its packaging from another member state is still on the hook itself.

What this means for you. If you are a micro-enterprise brand owner, check where your packaging supplier is based, because that single fact decides whether this is your obligation or theirs. If you are a packaging supplier, check whether any of your customers are micro-enterprises in your own country, because for those accounts the duty is yours, not theirs. Corrected on the Roles & Obligations tab and in the article guide. Source: Regulation (EU) 2025/40, Art. 3(1)(13)(a) and (b).

Site Update July 16, 2026

New "Prepare for PPWR" tab

Added a "Prepare for PPWR" tab, an action-oriented walkthrough of what producers should do ahead of the August 12, 2026 application date.

Site Update July 2, 2026

Interactive Fee Estimator and EU map

Expanded the Fee Estimator with per-SKU and country-specific fee structures for France, Italy, and the Netherlands, added a clickable SVG map of the EU to the Country Navigator, and built a status tracker for the nine pending delegated acts.

Site Update June 30, 2026

Format Risk Screener and Labeling tab

Added the Format Risk Screener with the A/B/C recyclability grade ladder and market-access dates, plus a consolidated Labeling requirements tab.

โ„น๏ธ About This Tab

This tab shows PPWR developments from the last 60 days, organized into two sections. Regulatory & Policy covers new EU delegated and implementing acts, official guidance, national scheme changes, enforcement, comment periods, and legislative movement. Site Updates covers new hub features and enhancements.

The primary sources monitored each week (EUR-Lex, the European Commission, national PRO portals, the JRC, and trade and legal press) are listed in the footer.

๐Ÿ’ถ EU Packaging Fee Estimator

Estimate annual EPR compliance fees across EU member states. Two modes: portfolio-level (enter annual tonnage by material) or per-SKU (enter each packaging component). Rates from verified 2025/2026 PRO schedules. Eco-modulation is excluded from the portfolio estimate and offered as an illustrative layer in the per-SKU estimator; design attributes can move fees by 10 to 100 percent.

๐Ÿ”“

See the full estimator

You are previewing the fee estimator. Add your details to unlock the portfolio and per-SKU estimators across every EU market.

We use your details to give you access and to respond to you. See our privacy terms. Only tick the box if you want email updates.
Enter annual tonnage by material for a given market. 12 categories reflecting how major EU PROs actually price packaging, plastic is split by format (rigid/flexible) and recyclability grade. Formula: Tonnes ร— PRO base rate (โ‚ฌ/tonne) = annual fee. Eco-modulation adjustments (ยฑ10โ€“100%), SME flat rates, and SUP per-unit fees not applied.
โš–๏ธ Annual Tonnage by Material
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ Countries to Compare
๐Ÿ’ฐ Estimated Annual EPR Fees
๐Ÿ’ถ
Enter tonnage to see results
Select countries and enter annual tonnes by material
โš ๏ธ Planning estimates only, not for compliance reporting. Rates are verified base fees from PRO schedules; eco-modulation (ยฑ10โ€“100%) excluded. Netherlands: Rigid Recyclable and Rigid Hard-to-Recycle show the same base rate, Verpact differentiates recyclability through eco-mod, not the base fee. Italy plastic rates from CONAI 9-band Corepla system. Germany: compliance rates not public. Spain uses Ecoembes household rates; industrial and commercial packaging goes to Envalora and is materially cheaper. Spanish glass is managed by Ecovidrio and carries a weight factor plus a unit factor; only the weight factor is shown here. France: CITEO 2026 official weight-based rates (the per-unit component is excluded here; use the Per-SKU Estimator to include it). CZ rates converted at 25.3 CZK/EUR; SE at 10.9 SEK/EUR. Sweden rates are among the EU's highest; NPA cut 2026 fees as the property-near (kerbside) collection rollout ran slower than planned, with increases due again Jan 2027.

๐Ÿ“‹ Rate Data Sources & Coverage

14 countries with confirmed or indicative primary-source rates. 1 country (Germany) does not publish compliance rates publicly. Italy (CONAI), Netherlands (Verpact), and Belgium (Fost Plus): plastic sub-categories from primary per-format rates. Other countries: rigid/flex sub-split estimated from published recyclable/non-recyclable rates.

CountryPRO / SourceYearConfidenceNotes

Contact

Questions, corrections, advisory inquiries, and suggestions are all welcome. Include your email if you would like a reply.